Some thoughts on repetition after listening to Zizek
Repetition in Hegel’s dialectical framework, seems to under pin
all modern philosophy and critical thinking. He gives the example of Caesar who
was once a real person but soon became a symbol of something far more fixed. We’re still
repeating except now we repeat the repetition more self-consciously. To the
point where self-consciousness has become so interwoven with our concept of
ourselves that it is invisible. I would argue that repetition is behind the progress of civilisation because it allows communication on a larger scale.
Celt and Pict art
is fluid and alive and whilst there is repetition it never repeats itself in
the same manner as Roman culture, which made a virtue of repeating the
symbolic. Hairy hippies are to be avoided, as is the swirling psychedelic
barbarian art.
So now we have come
through the rot of meaninglessness that saturated western culture after 1972
and we have absorbed the traits of appropriation effortlessly Things, Like
Caesar are rarely what they appear but instead are symbols of knowingness. This
is not as radical as we like to think when you consider that all communication
is based on repetition. The ability to explore these ideas in a structured
philosophical logic is underpinned by repetition. Hegel noted that the ability
to learn without understanding is what characterises modern civilisation. This
relies on repetition. Not just in the sense of learning by rote, although that
is only possible because of it, but by our ability to create signifiers from
original thought or object.
There is not enough specificity to fill the universal. What
is in the missing space? Dark matter. The void? The void after all is within
the original individual - the signifier and signified united. With repetition
the void is placed outside of the individual. This is where abstract expressionism
put itself and this is what pop art rejected. Pop art said get over it because the
specific and the universal are on the same plain – albeit on recto and verso in
Derrida’s terms.
Poetry and folktales remind us, we say of the first time. A time before repetition in a germinal state of noticing. The word remind implies the past when, I would argue it has always co-existed with the repetition. perhaps only been made manifest thanks to the repetition. So to conclude this realm of longing is a a vast attic made manifest by the key fashioned on a high precision lathe.
Poetry and folktales remind us, we say of the first time. A time before repetition in a germinal state of noticing. The word remind implies the past when, I would argue it has always co-existed with the repetition. perhaps only been made manifest thanks to the repetition. So to conclude this realm of longing is a a vast attic made manifest by the key fashioned on a high precision lathe.
Comments
Post a Comment